<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wells Fargo: Financier to the RAL Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://banktalk.org/2010/06/04/wells-fargo-financier-to-the-ral-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://banktalk.org/2010/06/04/wells-fargo-financier-to-the-ral-business/</link>
	<description>Exploring the Finances of the Unbanked</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:02:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Problems for Jackson Hewitt &#124; Bank Talk</title>
		<link>http://banktalk.org/2010/06/04/wells-fargo-financier-to-the-ral-business/comment-page-1/#comment-2416</link>
		<dc:creator>New Problems for Jackson Hewitt &#124; Bank Talk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banktalk.org/?p=2188#comment-2416</guid>
		<description>[...] to JTX&#8217;s status as a going concern that Wells Fargo has made it a sticking point in their financing for the tax firm. Wells has extended a $105 million credit to JTX, of which all but $12 million was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to JTX&#8217;s status as a going concern that Wells Fargo has made it a sticking point in their financing for the tax firm. Wells has extended a $105 million credit to JTX, of which all but $12 million was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sdoggie</title>
		<link>http://banktalk.org/2010/06/04/wells-fargo-financier-to-the-ral-business/comment-page-1/#comment-1771</link>
		<dc:creator>sdoggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banktalk.org/?p=2188#comment-1771</guid>
		<description>RM: My sense about Jackson Hewitt is here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/afErZd&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/afErZd&lt;/a&gt; 
 
I think that a) RALs will exist b) the FDIC still hasn\&#039;t acted, but they might c) RALs will cost more d) it could weigh on capital ratios e) Block has an interesting dilemma on its hands. f) I believe that there are other q\&#039;s left to be resolved. g) MetaBank could benefit </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RM: My sense about Jackson Hewitt is here: <a href="http://bit.ly/afErZd" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/afErZd</a> </p>
<p>I think that a) RALs will exist b) the FDIC still hasn\&#8217;t acted, but they might c) RALs will cost more d) it could weigh on capital ratios e) Block has an interesting dilemma on its hands. f) I believe that there are other q\&#8217;s left to be resolved. g) MetaBank could benefit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RMTaxPrep</title>
		<link>http://banktalk.org/2010/06/04/wells-fargo-financier-to-the-ral-business/comment-page-1/#comment-1718</link>
		<dc:creator>RMTaxPrep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 16:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banktalk.org/?p=2188#comment-1718</guid>
		<description>Now that the IRS discontinued the debt indicator, what&#039;s your take on this situation now? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that the IRS discontinued the debt indicator, what&#039;s your take on this situation now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pickup Insurance</title>
		<link>http://banktalk.org/2010/06/04/wells-fargo-financier-to-the-ral-business/comment-page-1/#comment-1424</link>
		<dc:creator>Pickup Insurance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 08:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banktalk.org/?p=2188#comment-1424</guid>
		<description>Hey, you really saved me a lot of time with all the information you have on this website. I found just what I was searching for I really appreciate it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, you really saved me a lot of time with all the information you have on this website. I found just what I was searching for I really appreciate it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

