Builders have stopped building, but not everywhere.
Fewer homes are being built across the United States. New starts fell of 71 percent between 2004 and 2009. 2004 and 2005 were peak years for new home construction in the United States. In both years, more than 2 million new homes were built. Last year, only 583,000 new homes were started.
Still, homes are still being built and in some states, the numbers are actually going up. Home construction is up more than 12 percent in North Dakota and almost two percent in Alaska.

This chart shows the percentage of new homes started in 2004 compared to those started in 2009 on a state-by-state basis. It is a randomly chosen set of states.
This chart supports the inference that the ebbs and tides of real estate – housing starts, foreclosures, mortgage financing – are driven by employment. Jobs are scarce in Nevada (14.4 percent), Michigan (13.1 percent), and Florida (11.1 percent). They aren’t much easier to come by in Georgia or Arizona, either. Indeed, Montana (7.7 percent) is the exception to the rule.
The Dakotas are just the opposite. The Bureau of Labor Statistics published data this month that shows how well both states are flourishing. North Dakota is slightly more fortunate, with less than 1 in 22 workers unable to find a job. It is the same in Nebraska (4.6 percent) and Oklahoma (7 percent). Washington, DC has fewer jobs, but it has many high-paid jobs.
South Dakota and North Dakota were exceptions to the subprime mortgage lending mania that gripped the country from 2001 to 2008.
Louisiana may be operating under an entirely different set of pressures. Housing starts haven’t been very popular in New Orleans since Katrina. The rest of the state suffers from another common problem: the cost of new construction is far higher than the price for a existing home. Housing in rural areas, no matter what state they are located in, seem to be given to this conundrum. That is certainly the case in parts of North Carolina.
Still, the real message of this chart should be to say that there is not really a national home building crisis. The problem is more of one that afflicts some regions. In many ways, it is an expression of the free market finding its equilibrium.