<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The OCC Strikes Again: No RALs for HSBC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://banktalk.org/2010/12/25/the-occ-strikes-again-no-rals-for-hsbc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://banktalk.org/2010/12/25/the-occ-strikes-again-no-rals-for-hsbc/</link>
	<description>Exploring the Finances of the Unbanked</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:08:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://banktalk.org/2010/12/25/the-occ-strikes-again-no-rals-for-hsbc/comment-page-1/#comment-5096</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banktalk.org/?p=3038#comment-5096</guid>
		<description>Question: If FDIC wanted to end RALs earlier in the year (per your posts), but went along only after the OCC issued new guidelines, why wouldn&#039;t they again follow the OCC and ban them? 
 
Also:Block can offer RACs on their own (they don&#039;t need HSBC). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question: If FDIC wanted to end RALs earlier in the year (per your posts), but went along only after the OCC issued new guidelines, why wouldn&#39;t they again follow the OCC and ban them? </p>
<p>Also:Block can offer RACs on their own (they don&#39;t need HSBC).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commenter</title>
		<link>http://banktalk.org/2010/12/25/the-occ-strikes-again-no-rals-for-hsbc/comment-page-1/#comment-5045</link>
		<dc:creator>Commenter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 08:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banktalk.org/?p=3038#comment-5045</guid>
		<description>Your site&#039;s RSS feed is not valid RSS link </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your site&#039;s RSS feed is not valid RSS link</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention The OCC Strikes Again: No RALs for HSBC via -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://banktalk.org/2010/12/25/the-occ-strikes-again-no-rals-for-hsbc/comment-page-1/#comment-5028</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The OCC Strikes Again: No RALs for HSBC via -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 23:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banktalk.org/?p=3038#comment-5028</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Justin Hosie. Justin Hosie said: Bank Talk: The OCC Strikes Again: No RALs for HSBC - The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (The &quot;OCC&quot;) direc... http://ow.ly/1aBBHz [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Justin Hosie. Justin Hosie said: Bank Talk: The OCC Strikes Again: No RALs for HSBC &#8211; The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (The &quot;OCC&quot;) direc&#8230; <a href="http://ow.ly/1aBBHz" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/1aBBHz</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

